Richard Burgin, Interviewed by Ann McCutchan

//Richard Burgin, Interviewed by Ann McCutchan

Richard Burgin, Interviewed by Ann McCutchan

An Interview with Richard Burgin


Prior to the publication of Richard Burgin’s eighth collection of short stories, Hide Island, ALR Editor-in-Chief Ann McCutchan interviewed the author about his life, work, and the genesis of the distinguished literary journal Boulevard, of which he is founding editor.  In addition to shared literary interests, McCutchan and Burgin come from musical backgrounds, which set the initial tone of their conversation.

Ann McCutchan: You’re a writer, and you’ve also composed many songs. I’m very interested in your musical background. You know I am a musician, too, and was coached in chamber music with both of your parents, Richard Burgin and Ruth Posselt, who were well-known violinists. I’m curious about your background in that musical household, and the effects of that upbringing on you as an artist, in general.

Richard Burgin: Well, next to not having more children, as I only have one, the biggest regret of my life is that I didn’t go into music, study and pursue it seriously, so I have to begin with that.  I never studied music, except when I was very young.  I played the piano with my aunt, who was my mother’s sister — she had a number of sisters who were also professional musicians.  I studied with my mother, too.  One of my earliest childhood memories was crying because I wanted to go out and play, and not practice the piano.  My parents were both kind of liberal softies; they gave in and I never studied piano again.  Everything I do in music is by ear; I have no training whatsoever.  

AM: What kind of teacher was your mother?

RB: She was a perfectionist. It was probably a big mistake to study with her.  I was 6 or 7 years old when I stopped, and my main memory was her perfectionism.  That decision really shaped the rest of my life, because I’ve always loved music more than literature.  Maybe this is overstating the point, but it’s a little like being a person who feels they’ve been born with the wrong gender.  I’ve had what success I’ve had as a writer, but have always yearned to be a professional musician.  That was the life I didn’t live, because of the decision to stop studying the piano and other psychological factors.  When I got older I made a few attempts to study, but it was too late and not psychologically possible.  So you know, it’s one of those road not taken things.  

AM: Can you tell me a little about the music you compose, and the composers or pieces of music you love the most?

RB: I have written over one hundred songs and pieces, and I have self-produced four CDs and been paid for doing two others.

For the Ontario Review Press, Joyce Carol Oates wanted to have a CD of my songs as part of a book of mine, so that was kind of a thrill for me (I had been sending her tapes of my piano pieces for awhile). The book consisted of twenty stories and twenty songs, with a CD.  It was called The Identity Club: New and Selected Stories and Songs. That was the first time I was ever paid for my music.  And then I became friendly with Gloria Vanderbilt, and she asked me to write a song she produced to help promote a doll she designed, and she appeared with me on the Home Shopping Network to sell the doll, so I wrote the song for that. Recently, I’ve done more pop music, heavily influenced by jazz and classical. My 2008 CD, The Trouble With Love, got a nice response, and a couple of good reviews. So I have done probably a hundredth of what I could have done had I ever studied.  I add that to make myself seem not so pathetic, which I have a knack for doing, as anyone who knows me knows.

AM: It’s part of your charm.

RB: In classical music, my favorites, besides the usual Bach, Beethoven and Mozart, are Stravinsky and Mahler.  One of the great musical experiences of my life was seeing my father conduct Mahler’s Second Symphony.  He had a great success with it at Tanglewood [Music Center], and my sister was singing in the chorus.  Also Das Lied von der Erde, his fourth symphony, and his uncompleted tenth are all profound musical experiences, among the great works of art of all time.

To me, Stravinsky is the greatest composer of the 20th century; he seemingly never makes an aesthetic mistake. He has so much wit and charm in every line that he writes.  I love everything he wrote from Le Sacre du Printemps to the chamber music, the violin concerto . . . I love all of his periods. He’s kind of like Picasso; I associate the two in my mind.  And like Picasso, he could write in any style that he wanted.  I love Prokofiev, too.  Maybe he’s not a great composer with a capital G, but he’s written some of the most heart-breakingly beautiful melodies ever. 

Among more contemporary composers, I like George Crumb, some of Phil Glass, and Harry Partch, so I’m pretty eclectic in my tastes. In jazz, Bill Evans is my favorite pianist. I wrote a little essay about him that was in a book called A Concert I’ll Never Forget, and then it got reprinted in a reader of my work that came out in France.

AM: What is it about Evans? What did he do, that no one else had done?

RB: I think he brought a kind of lyricism and introspection, a whole range of emotions to jazz, as well as a softness . . . he became more beautiful, more dramatic, the softer he played.  He had a great ear for harmony.  He’s strong rhythmically and strong melodically, but he’s a flat out genius harmonically.  He brought Impressionism to jazz, if you will; I think his music can easily hold its own with the piano music of Debussy or Ravel.  He’s kind of the Chopin of jazz.  He got criticized a lot for being so soft, so introspective, but that’s my favorite Evans.  His style evolved and he became more openly expressive in the latter part of his too-short life, but I still prefer the Evans of Live at the Village Vanguard 1961 than the Evans of the late 70s, when he was trying to be a little bit more crowd friendly.

AM: Do you think that’s a temptation for any artist, to play to the crowd?  Or is it a career move that’s foisted upon them?

RB: I think in the case of Evans, he wasn’t doing it to help himself commercially. I think he had incredible integrity as a musician. I think he tried to do it for aesthetic reasons — he came to agree or wanted to respond to his critics for aesthetic reasons.  It’s not like he abandoned lyricism completely, by any stretch, but he became more extroverted in his playing.  And sometimes that
is a strength that is refreshing.  He was adventuresome; he was always trying different things, even though his style was recognizable throughout his career.  So it’s a subtle thing I’m describing – the move to a more extroverted style.

AM: Do you think that having absorbed music in your household, and being a music lover all your life, has affected you as a writer?  Or maybe I’m just going for the ear here.  Has your writerly ear been helped or influenced by music?

RB: It’s possible. It’s hard to know. I’m a little wary of connecting those two arts because I think of them so differently.  But I will say this: the plot of my first novel, Ghost Quartet, concerns a famous Bernstein-like composer, and it takes place in Juilliard and New York City, and also at Tanglewood [the Boston Symphony’s summer home]. I obviously couldn’t have written that book in any authentic way if I hadn’t come from a musical family and spent the first 16 summers of my life at Tanglewood and lived in New York, known so many performing musicians and heard so many stories about them from my parents.

AM: I really enjoyed that novel.  I recognized the people and the situations.  It was spot on.  And beautifully written.

RB: Thank you.  So music definitely played a role in that particular book, and in other work, where I’ve made references to musicians. I’m thinking of this story called “Caesar,” the first story in my last book of stories, Shadow Traffic.  Caesar is talking about Ravel and Debussy to the cab driver.  But in terms of actually influencing my style of writing, I don’t know if it does or not.

AM: Let’s move to writers, then.  Who are your models, the authors you admire the most or have taken the most from?  And let me pair that with another question, and go where you want to go with it. You mentioned in the Huffington Post interview last year that the reading experience is neglected in MFA programs.

RB: Did I really say that?

AM: Yes you did!

RB: That’s my feeling, but I have to qualify that by saying I have never been in an MFA program, except when I’ve visited to give readings or lectures.  I don’t really have first-hand knowledge, but it strikes me from talking to MFA graduates, that most of what they’re reading is other students’ work, and they don’t read many other authors as part of their program. And maybe I’m wrong, maybe it’s changed, I don’t know. But I remember some years ago in New York, having lunch with a fiction editor who had the power to acquire books for Simon and Schuster, and we got into a discussion which evolved into an argument about this topic, and I asked her, “Have you read anything by Kafka?”  And she said no.  “By Faulkner?” No.  And I said, “How can you judge people’s work if you haven’t read the people who have influenced their work? It would be like a curator for a gallery having never seen Van Gogh or Rembrandt.  And she said, “You don’t need to have that background in literature, you just need to know what will sell to the demographics the company is aiming at.”  I get the feeling — and maybe I’m wrong, that MFA students are mostly reading each other’s work, and stories that get published in The New Yorker. They’re not reading people like Celine, Beckett, or Bernhard, for example.

When you were an MFA student, was that part of the curriculum? Did they have you read?

AM: Yes, they did. In the writing workshops at the University of Houston there were assigned readings along with the student work.  This is the way my colleagues and I run workshops at UNT.  I think most of us teach classics as well as contemporary writers.  It works — though, if I ask a creative nonfiction workshop to read Seneca, some students balk.

What about the writers who have influenced you most?

RB: Quite a number, of course. I’d say the writers who’ve had the most influence aren’t necessarily the writers who I think are the greatest.  They don’t always coincide. For example, I don’t think Shakespeare has influenced me in any way, thought I wouldn’t deny his greatness.  So bearing that in mind: I think Tolstoy is one of the greatest fiction writers, but I think I’ve been much more influenced by Dostoevsky. 

AM: In what way?

RB: In spirit.  In my case, I think I’m most influenced by people I have a psychological or emotional connection to, and I think I’m closer to Dostoevsky’s type of soul than Tolstoy’s — even though I think Tolstoy’s a greater writer.

It’s why I identify more with Mahler than Mozart, though I think Mozart’s a greater composer. 

AM: Can you describe what draws you to Dostoevsky?

RB: He’s a master of showing the ambivalence of people, their excessive pride.  I’m thinking of the Underground Man, which became a prototype for the monologue as a form.  So many monologists have come from Notes From the Underground alone.  Everyone from Camus, (The Stranger and The Fall) to one of my very favorite writers, the much-neglected Austrian writer, Thomas Bernhard.

AM: I’ve not read him.

RB: Not many people in America have.  He, in turn, was influenced by Notes From the Underground, especially in his novella Concrete (1982), which I recommend as a good place to start reading Bernhard.  You can read it in an hour and a half.

So, because I used to write a lot of first-person monologue-type works of fiction, I was influenced by Dostoevsky.  But also, he was a master of a frankly neurotic psychology, a master of understanding it.  So few American writers have any ideas about the inner world at all.  Everything is experienced through what Philip Rahv called the cult of experience.   To Dostoevsky, ideas were as real as his characters, and he knew how to dramatize ideas, especially in Crime and Punishment but also in The Brothers Karamazov, in the grand inquisitor section.  Ideas were of real consequence, and were part of his literary landscape.  That has influenced me a lot, because I like ideas as a component of fiction.

And there are other writers who influenced me, too: Faulkner, Kafka, Borges. 

AM: You said American writers are not as interested in ideas as, say, European writers. Why do you think that’s so?

RB: We don’t have a philosophical tradition or much respect or interest in teaching philosophy in this country.  I don’t think many people in MFA programs have read The Critique of Pure Reason by Kant, or even The Interp
retation of Dreams
by Freud, and those are two of the most important books for forming my conception of human reality. 

I don’t think Americans find ideas very saleable or sexy or whatever you want to call it.  They’re either dismissed as elitist nonsense, or just not helpful in selling a book.

AM: So it all comes down to mercantile considerations?

RB: It’s a vicious circle.  So few people write books in which ideas play an important part, and when editors get one, they don’t know what to make of it.  I’m guessing they dismiss it as boring, unnecessary, beside the point, not part of a plot.  Ideas are not an important dimension, not looked for or valued.  So if they’re not valued, people aren’t writing about them, and if someone does write a work of ideas, it’s not going to get very far. 

AM: We hear editors choose the kinds of books they read, themselves.  Perhaps they’re in a world some of us don’t occupy . . . ?

RB: Every now and then it amazes me that Borges published to the extent he did.  It was kind of a perfect storm of circumstances, including the dawn of psychedelics, and people looked at his stories as kind of psychedelic.  He was the first writer since Dante to write about infinity — to focus on astonishment at the universe itself.  It’s very hard to write about those feelings, and he was able to find metaphors to partially express the inexpressible.

AM: As a teacher, would you speak about the consequences, for a writer, of a thin reading background?

RB: I don’t know if I’m prepared the answer that, because I don’t feel I’ve read widely or deeply, myself.  There are some things I’m proud of having read, like the complete Remembrance of Things Past, because Proust is one of my very favorite writers.  But I have many big gaps in my own reading background.  I don’t know.  I think it’s a mysterious question, why some people are able to write better, more movingly, more deeply than others.  I don’t think it can be traced, necessarily, to how many books a person has read.  I think the best-read person in the world might not be able to write one single interesting paragraph.

I guess what it comes down to is my belief that talent is innate and genetic, more than anything else. I know this goes against what a lot of people think: that you can learn how to be an artist by going to an MFA program.  But I don’t believe that.  I think you can improve your skills, and you might get inspired or motivated by the work of other people, or by contact with teachers, but can talent be taught? Absolutely not.  If that were true, we would have many more Beethovens and Picassos and Flannery O’Connors and James Joyces than exist!

AM: I’m right with you on that.  

Back to reading, if you don’t mind.  I’m aware of how necessary it is to slow down one’s reading process, to absorb any great work.  Students often whip through stuff just in time for class.  Would you speak a little about the time, or the speed with which one reads?

RB: I could never read Remembrance of Things Past in its entirety now.  I just wouldn’t have the energy. It’s something I did in my early 30s. 

I’m a single parent; my first allegiance, first wave of energy, goes toward my son. He’s number one in my life. Then there is my own work, and reading for Boulevard, so there isn’t much time or energy left to read books.  That makes me sound like an ignoramus, but it’s been one of the realities of my life, the last few years.

AM: I think we all fight for time.  

RB: To be honest, I love music more.  I’d much rather listen to music than read. 

AM: Ha! Me, too.

Please tell me about your new book, Hide Island.  It consists of a novella and nine stories.  Is there a general theme, or are the stories more discrete?

RB: I’ve never done a book of linked stories, or one where there’s an overarching theme that connects everything. Some of these stories were written years ago, some were written in the last year. The only thing I try to do in a collection is to find a balance – so a dark story is followed by a more optimistic one, or a story in which the protagonist is male is followed by one from a female point of view.

In this case, I begin the collection as many people do with what I think is one of the strongest stories — a story called “Atlantis,” which appeared in the anthology New Jersey Noir, edited by Joyce Carol Oates.

The novella, called the The Memory Center, is a long story.  It’s kind of a sequel to my story “Memo and Oblivion,” which was in my last published book Shadow Traffic (Johns Hopkins).  “Memo and Oblivion” was set in a futuristic New York City and deals with two rival drug organizations, one devoted to a drug called Memo, which can increase memory exponentially, but has some ironic consequences.  (We may think we want to remember certain things, but other things we don’t want to remember.)  Some who took it went into depression, or even committed suicide.  Oblivion is the name of the other drug; it allows people to forget the past, and the details of their life.   The protagonist gets caught between the two rival organizations, doing undercover work.  So — The Memory Center deals with some of the characters and themes of “Memo and Oblivion,” and an attempt by a bizarre and tortured doctor to surgically create a situation of memory selection — where you can eliminate some memories and keep others. It’s suspenseful and there’s a love story and it tries to deal with some ideas about memory and identity.

AM: It sounds like you’re driven by a big idea here.

RB: A number of times I’ve created stories about organizations like The Identity Club, where people dress like, talk like, and try to live out the lives and deaths of artists they admire.  They’re obsessed with and try to “become” them.  That was one of my most successful stories in terms of reader response.  I even got contacted by Paramount Studios. There was a close call – it almost got made into a movie, but it didn’t happen.  It was reprinted in Best American Mystery Stories, and The Ecco Anthology of Contemporary American Short Fiction.  That story dealt with ideas.

AM: Is that how a story might begin and evolve?  You have a particular idea you want to turn over and over, and fiction is right the medium for it?

RB: What happens is that I’ll see or feel something — it might just be the expression on someone’s face as they
get into a car, or a feeling I’ll get walking down the street, looking at someone. And that image or emotion, or the two of them combined, will trigger something in me unconsciously, from my own life.  And maybe that’s how many of my stories begin.  Something in the outside world triggers something in my unconscious.

AM: Your history with Boulevard is laid out elsewhere, but I haven’t heard you speak about your motivation for starting the journal. Would you talk about that?

RB: I like to make things, in general.  And to a degree — not as much as writing or composing, certainly — making a literary magazine is a creative endeavor.  I‘ve devoted my working life to making different things, so one impulse was simply the desire to make a magazine.

I think the immediate impetus was a conversation with one of the editors of a literary magazine and in the course of it, I found out how relatively inexpensive it cost to do. This conversation took place 30 years ago, of course.

So once I found out it was economically feasible, as long as you had some source of regular money, or some start-up money, then I started thinking about doing it  There was also, frankly, a practical reason.  I knew two things at that point: that I was going to teach as a way of supporting myself, and also that I was never going to get a PhD.  I just wasn’t the scholar type. I wasn’t motivated in that direction.  I actually loathed graduate school at Columbia, where I went. Some of it was my fault, too, but that’s another subject.

And so I figured that to get any kind of college job without a PhD – I didn’t even dream about a tenure-track job at that time – I would need to publish more than my peers, so starting a journal had a practical purpose.  This could help me in academia, and it kind of proved to be true.  Those were my practical and aesthetic reasons for starting Boulevard.

AM: Where did the name Boulevard come from?

RB: If I tried to get the exact details, I’d probably make a mistake.  The journal was incorporated in 1984 in New York, by a small group of writer-editor aspirants.  I think I actually suggested the title Boulevard.  We didn’t want to have a Greek mythological title like Antaeus. We just wanted a one-word title that wouldn’t be embarrassing or too arcane, and would stick in the mind.  At the same time we wanted to suggest something sort of expansive, maybe a little elegant. We had a commitment to publishing international writers, too.  Boulevard implies the central part of a city, the wide expansive part where different streets meet.  It seemed to meet all the criteria.

AM:  And the rest is history – an extraordinary run that continues.  Richard, thanks for speaking with me, and hearty congratulations on the publication of Hide Island.

Richard Burgin is a fiction writer, editor, composer, critic and teacher. Born in Brookline, Massachusetts he graduated from Brandeis University and received advanced degrees from Columbia in New York. Burgin is the author of 16 books, including the forthcoming Hide Island: A Novella and Ten Stories (Texas Review Press, October 2013) as well as the novels Rivers Last Longer (2010) and Ghost Quartet (l999), and the short story collections The Spirit Returns (2001), Fear of Blue Skies (l998), Private Fame (1991), and Man Without Memory (l989). The latter three books were each listed as a Notable Book of the Year by The Philadelphia Inquirer. Johns Hopkins University Press published Richard’s most recent story collections,Shadow Traffic and The Conference on Beautiful Moments (2007). His book, The Identity Club: New and Selected Stories and Songs, was listed in The Times Literary Supplement as one of the best books of 2006 and was listed in The Huffington Postas one of the 40 best books of fiction in the last decade. The Identity Club also includes a CD of his musical compositions. Burgin’s stories have won five Pushcart Prizes and 15 others have been listed by that prestigious anthology as being among the year’s best.The title story of The Identity Club was also reprinted in Best American Mystery Stories 2005 and The Ecco Anthology of Contemporary American Short Fiction (published by Harper Perennial 2008) edited by Joyce Carol Oates. Other stories have been reprinted in the anthologies New Jersey Noir (Akashic Books), New Stories from the Midwest, The Best of Witness and As the Story Goes: Twenty Five Years of the Johns Hopkins Short Fiction Series, among others. For his extended biography, please visit the author’s website.



























































By |2018-12-05T15:20:32+00:00December 5th, 2018|Uncategorized|0 Comments

About the Author:

Leave A Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: